Artificial Intelligence and Education: Is It Necessary, Is It Convenient? | Editorial Octaedro

LIBRO COMPLETO: The Education Revolution through Artificial Intelligence

CAPÍTULO 2

FICHA TÉCNICA

Fecha de publicación:
04/11/2024

Doi del capítulo:

https://doi.org/10.36006/09651-1-02

Título del libro: The Education Revolution through Artificial Intelligence

URL del libro:

https://octaedro.com/libro/the-education-revolution-through-artificial-intelligence/

ISBN del libro: 9788410282582

DOI del libro:

https://doi.org/10.36006/09651-1

Artificial Intelligence and Education: Is It Necessary, Is It Convenient?

Enlace de descarga

Abstract

“Blockchain, cryptocurrencies and metaverse are technologies that have been all the rage in recent years. One might be tempted to add Artificial Intelligence to this group of technologies as just another fad, but unlike these, AI has been able to integrate into many areas of people’s lives and find practical use cases. It was already doing so implicitly through virtual assistants (Siri, Alexa, etc.), but now it is doing so openly, with users being aware that they are using AI tools.
What is happening with AI, as has happened with other technologies throughout history, is that its supporters and detractors quickly emerge. And even more so when dealing with a subject as sensitive as education. Some tend to idealize its use, minimizing possible problems or risks, while others tend to fatalize about it and about the havoc it will cause.
Given this situation, it is worthwhile to critically analyze the advantages and disadvantages of AI as an educational tool, always asking the same question: what is in the best interest of the students?
In this book chapter we analyze different use cases and technical reports that will allow us to identify advantages, disadvantages, and good practices.”

Palabras clave

artificial Intelligence, education, ethicss, students, teachers

Autores

PhD Enrique Estellés-Arolas, PhD Javier Pérez Bou

Cómo citar

Estellés-Arolas, E., Pérez Bou, J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Education: Is It Necessary, Is It Convenient?. In Hervás-Gómez, C., Díaz-Noguera, M. D., Sánchez-Vera, F. (Coords.), The Education Revolution Through Artificial Intelligence (pp. 29-42). Octaedro. https://doi.org/10.36006/09651-1-02

Referencias bibliográficas

“Baek, Y., Jung, J., & Kim, B. (2008). What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education, 50 (1), 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.05.002
Barrio Maestre, J. M. (2008). Educación y verdad. Teoría de la Educación, 20, 83-102.
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, USA, Article 159, 1877-1901.
Cazzaniga, M., Jaumotte, F., Li, L., Melina, G., Panton, A. J., Pizzinelli, C., Rockall, E., & Mendes Tavares, M. (2024). Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work. IMF Staff Discussion, note SDN2024/001, International Monetary Fund.
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Ciborra, C. (2002). The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems. OUP Oxford.
Crace, J. (2023, September 11). Switching off: Sweden says back-to-basics schooling works on paper. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/11/sweden-says-back-to-basics-schooling-works-on-paper
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920. Teachers College.
Cuban, L. (2018). The Flight of a Butterfly or the Path of a Bullet? Using technology to transform teaching and learning. Harvard Education.
Desmuget, M. (2015). La fábrica de cretinos digitales. Los peligros de las pantallas para nuestros hijos. Península.
Fujimoto, S., & Takemoto, K. (2023) Revisiting the political biases of ChatGPT. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1232003
Gartner (s. f.). Hype Cycle. https://www.gartner.es/es/metodologias/hype-cycle
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student-teacher relationships. In G. G. Bear, & K. M. Minke (Eds.). Children’s Needs III: Development, Prevention, and Intervention (pp. 59-71). National Association of School Psychologists.
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2023). A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.05232
Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Klisarova-Belcheva, S., Dimitrov, A., Bratkov, M., & Angelov, D. (2023). Effects of generative chatbots in higher education. Information, 14 (9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14090492
Juel, C. (1996). What makes literacy tutoring effective? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 268-289.
Kadaruddin, K. (2023). Empowering education through generative AI: Innovative instructional strategies for tomorrow’s learners. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 4(2), 618-625. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v4i2.215
Kocoń, J., Cichecki, I., Kaszyca, O., Kochanek, M., Szydło, D., Baran, J., Bielaniewicz, J., Gruza, M., Janz, A., Kanclerz, K., Kocoń, A., Koptyra, B., Mieleszczenko-Kowszewicz, W., Miłkowski, P., Oleksy, M., Piasecki, M., Radliński, L., Wojtasik, K., Woźniak, S., & Kazienko, P. (2023). ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none. Information Fusion, 99, 101861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101861
Liu, R., Zenke, C., Liu, C., Holmes, A., Thornton, P., & Malan, D. J. (2024). Teaching CS50 with AI. Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2024), USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630938
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. UNESCO.
Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). Inteligencia artificial y educación: guía para las personas a cargo de formular políticas. UNESCO.
Mounier, E. (1990). Obras completas (vol. 3). Sígueme.
Nasr, M., Carlini, N., Hayase, J., Jagielski, M., Cooper, A.F., Ippolito, D., Choquette-Choo, C.A., Wallace, E., Tramèr, F., & Lee, K. (2023). Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.17035
Newton, P., & Xiromeriti, M. (2024). ChatGPT performance on multiple choice question examinations in higher education. A pragmatic scoping review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2299059
OET, Office of Educational Technology (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations. U.S. Department of Education.
OpenAI (2023). Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1982). Meditación de la técnica y otros ensayos sobre ciencia y filosofía. Revista Occidente, Alianza.
Parra Pennefather, P. (2023). Generative AI with personalities. In Creative Prototyping with generative AI (pp. 65-89). Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9579-3_3
Qureshi, B. (2023). ChatGPT in computer science curriculum assessment: An analysis of its successes and shortcomings. Proceedings of the 2023 9th International Conference on e-Society, e-Learning and e-Technologies (pp. 7-13). https://doi.org/10.1145/3613944.3613946
Reich, J. (2020). Failure to Disrupt: Why Technology Alone Can’t Transform Education. Harvard University.
Rescher, N. (1999). Razón y valores en la era científico-tecnológica. Paidós.
Shalom, J. G., Israeli, H., Marko Vitzky, O., LiPsitz, J. D. (2015). Social anxiety and physiological arousal during computer mediated vs. face to face communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.056
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Tonmoy, S. M. T. I., Zaman, S. M. M., Jain, V., Rani, A., Rawte, V., Chadha, A., & Das, A. (2024). A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.01313
UNESCO (2019). Beijing Consensus on Artificial Intelligence and Education. UNESCO Publishing https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368303
Van Deemter, K. (2024). The pitfalls of defining hallucination. Computational Linguistics, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00509
Wang, F., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Why do teachers need to use technology in their classrooms? Issues, problems, and solutions. Computers in the Schools, 20(4), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v20n04_05
Xu, Z., Jain, S., & Kankanhalli, M. (2024). Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.11817
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S., Istenič, A., Spector, M., Liu, J., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021) A review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, Article 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
02”